21:06, Tuesday, 31.03.2015
ქართული English

Web Portal on Human Rights in Georgia

Advanced Search

Analyze of Actual Practice in Discussing Administrative Suits Presented

Today, the Georgian Young Lawyers Association held a presentation dealing with the Analyze of Practice in Discussing Administrative Suits at the venue of the Hotel Ambassador. The event was organized within the framework of Publicity of Information that will continue from August 1 to August 10. 

Giorgi Chkheidze, the head of the association, stated the research has been going on for four months. It aimed to assess the efficiency of the activities of corresponding administrative bodies while discussion administrative suits dealing with the publicity and access to information since changes were introduced into the law regarding such kinds of legal suits. More precisely, on December 29 2007 an amendment was introduced to the law according to which the petitioner has to submit the complaint first to higher administrative body and then to the court.

During the implemented research the GYLA submitted 100 applications and 83 suits to administrative bodies. 62, 65 percent of the submitted suits were received but not acted upon. 

Nina Ghvinianidze, one of the authors of the research, stated that the survey demonstrates the fact that in most cases administrative bodies do not know the essence of the administrative suit and procedures for eventual discussions. Those responsible for case discussion rebuked them for having submitted the suit and advised them to send repeated or more detailed applications to their institutions. Such a similar attitude has negative influence on case discussion procedures and possible outcomes. 

Administrative bodies formally precede the cases regarding administrative suits. Consequently, the amendments made in December of 2007 were not effective and it contradicts two articles of the acting Georgian Constitution. More exactly, it restricts the publicity of information and accessibility to the court.

The GYLA intends to bring suit to the Georgian Constitutional Court today and will request to discuss the amendments introduced on December 29 2007, as whether their compliance to the Constitution must be guaranteed or not.

Source: Medianews

Print Send to Friend Send to Facebook Tweet This
Leave your comment
Your name:
Your comment:

Security code: Code
Who will more effectively investigate the high-profile cases?
Chief Prosecutor’s office Temporary investigation commission of the Parliament Independent investigation body Commission for the identification of the miscarriages of justice I do not know


Fragile Peace in Balkans
After a long and complicated preparation period, on July 30, we landed in Sarajevo. Despite scary landing caused by bad weather conditions, I
Hungry Commission Members and Commission Chairpersons Angry with Observers in Batumi
Seal without Carve and Voter with Two Names in Guria


What happened to Dream of Justice Revival?
“Miscarriages of justice“– we use this term to characterize the problems existing in the system of Georgian judiciary during ex-president Mikheil Saakashvili’s governance. 
Triggers of Prisoners’ Mass Protests
Autumn Fly

Copyright © 2004 - 2015 HRIDC