09:24, Thursday, 02.10.2014
YouTube
Twitter
Facebook
RSS
ქართული English

Web Portal on Human Rights in Georgia

Go
Advanced Search

Three Georgian Photographers Plea-Bargain for Suspended Sentences

02.08.2011

Vladimir Socor, the Jamestown Foundation

Georgia’s official presidential photographer, another photographer who was an Internal Affairs Ministry contract employee, and the Tbilisi representative of the European Pressphoto Agency (EPA), have all pleaded guilty and received suspended sentences on espionage charges. The three were in pre-trial detention since July 7, suspected of photocopying and collecting state-classified documents for delivery to Russian military intelligence (GRU) contacts (see EDM, July 14).

On July 22, the three were released in the courtroom after a 45-minute trial, based on a plea-bargaining agreement signed that same day by the defendants, their respective lawyers, the prosecution and the court. Presidential photographer Irakli Gedenidze, the Interior Ministry’s former photographer on contract Giorgi Abdaladze, and EPA’s Tbilisi representative Zurab Kurtsikidze were sentenced to prison terms of three years, three years and two years, respectively. In the same move, the court suspended the imprisonment sentences and put the defendants on probation terms for three years, three years, and four years, respectively. They retain the right to exercise their profession in Georgia while on probation. Abdaladze’s wife received a six-month suspended sentence for minor complicity.

According to the Prosecutor’s Office, the defendants fully cooperated with the investigation and corroborated information about Russian intelligence activities against Georgia. The value of this information earned them mitigating circumstances. Under Georgia’s criminal code, the defendants were liable to prison terms of up to 12 years. Apparently, the plea-bargain and the court’s lenience are intended to encourage agents or collaborators of Russian intelligence in Georgia to seek similar arrangements with the authorities.

The trial had to be held in camera because the evidence consisted of classified documents photocopied by the defendants. Some documents were too sensitive to be submitted in evidence for the trial. Documents that were submitted to the court included a floor layout of President Mikheil Saakashvili’s residence, lists of cleaning personnel of the presidential buildings and of the State Procurement Agency (provider of services to the presidential administration), a schedule of the president’s appointments and itineraries of his visits in the country, a schedule of coordinated actions by the state guards’ service and the Internal Affairs Ministry, a plan of security measures for Estonian President Toomas Ilves’s recent visit to Georgia, transcripts of Azerbaijani Foreign Affairs Minister Elmar Mammadyarov’s recent top-level meetings in Tbilisi, as well as lists of Georgian citizens employed by the United Nations, OSCE and the Council of Europe.

These were photocopied official documents, found in the defendants’ homes and computers during the investigation by the Internal Affairs Ministry’s counterintelligence division. The prosecution also submitted a list of phone calls between Kurtsikidze and two purported GRU officers. Within hours of the trial on July 22, Georgia’s Justice Ministry posted the evidence on its website (www.justice.gov.ge, Civil Georgia, Netgazeti, www.presa.ge, July 22).

Documents containing these types of information could clearly be used by the intelligence services “of a neighboring country” (as Georgian authorities phrased it) for hostile penetration of Georgian presidential buildings, recruiting agents and informants, circumventing security arrangements, and potentially orchestrating some “special operation” to physically remove the Georgian president and his team. The Kremlin has more than once publicly alluded to such an operation against President Saakashvili. His predecessor, Eduard Shevardnadze, had been the target of two assassination attempts organized in Russia and openly welcomed by Moscow’s official establishment at that time. Thus, the Georgian government cannot be too cautious about documents, such as the photocopies found in the photographers’ possession, being delivered to Russian intelligence contacts.

Gedenidze, the presidential photographer, made an early confession on July 9. Abdaladze, the Interior Ministry’s former contract photographer, pleaded not guilty and declared a hunger strike initially, but recanted and confessed on July 18. Their lawyers were present during those confessions. The authorities aired the videotapes on television posted them on the internet on the same day in each case, and also distributed the videotapes to journalists on CDRoms (Rustavi 2 TV, Imedi TV, Civil Georgia, July 9, 10, 18, 19, 22). The confessions were intended for public information, but did not form a basis for the criminal charges. Only the documents found in the defendants’ possession during the investigation were submitted in evidence to the court.

A militant element among Georgian opposition journalists portrayed this investigation as a move to intimidate journalists and restrict media freedom. This reasoning reflected five misconceptions. First, the investigation was unrelated to any journalistic or political activity of the defendants, but only concerned their illegal handling of state-classified documents. Second, Gedenidze and Abdaladze had the status of employees of state institutions, not journalists, at the time of their wrongdoings (while Kurtsikidze worked for a foreign employer, EPA). Third, the trial could not be open to the media and the public – as the militant opposition journalists insisted – because it involved classified documents (some of which could not be submitted even in camera) and the risk of openly provoking Russia. Fourth, these critics completely overlooked the security implications of a possible Russian penetration of the presidential buildings. And fifth, the demand for full declassification of the evidence and an “independent” investigation by the media would have turned due process of law into a populist exercise.

Rather than reporting the case, the opposition press insisted that media freedom and indeed photography itself was being suppressed in Georgia. By way of argument, opposition newspapers appeared with blank spaces inscribed with protests, in the spaces reserved for photographs. That logic recalled the 2009 protests during which opposition groups built imitation prison cells as a protest action, in the absence of any political prisoners in Georgia. The claim that Georgian media freedom and photography are being suppressed, similarly belongs in a realm of fantasy.

Original text

Print Send to Friend Send to Facebook Tweet This
Name: Marina Andguladze
2011-08-17 15:59
Joint Appeal to US State Department from Relatives of Georgian Photojournalists, Accused of Espionage


We have to send a copy of our previous Appeal of July, 7, 2011 to you for want of any positive reaction on your part. We hope that it has been more likely a sad mistake than ignoration of our public opinion.
As a matter of fact, detention of such Georgian photojournalists as Giorgi Abdaladze, Irakli Gedenidze and Zurab Kurtsikidze, as well as, their follow-up charge of spying for Russia, had a wide public response not only in Georgia, but also much outside it. And although local law bodies tried to legalize all their actions, in reality factual evidence of photojournalists’ guilt was never offered by them. As to confessions of so-called espionage activities, which have been received from the detainees under duress and rather shady circumstances, they cannot be well founded. Detention of these men in the night-time, the steps in their proceedings, the case files classification, cynical behavior of our authorities to acts of protest here, as well as, constant TV insinuations have evoked deep indignation of independent media and the major part of our society.
We interpret all that has happened as vengeance weapon of our authorities, pursued by their pressure those, who try to tell the truth about their factual withdrawal from developing democracy in this country. The so-called press photographers’ case, cooked by our security officials, has brought to light the current system weakness, showing us on large scale the fact that our police, procuratorate and law court is a part and political instrument of power. All this demonstrates that in reality groups and the whole corporate bodies of legal advisers have been appeared in this country. They openly support illegal actions of our authorities and go to failure in their legal ethics just for their own benefit!
We consider that such steps discredit Georgia with the general public, causing damage to international image of this country and to its relations with other nations. The responsibility for it falls on, first of all, our current president and security ministers.
Expressing serious concern towards rather negative prospects for democratic development of current Georgia and realizing the possibility of rolling the country back to totalitarianism and anticonstitutional chaos, we call upon you to give blame-worthy estimate to all that has happened here, as well as, to draw all necessary conclusions and arrive at correct decisions.
At the same time we wish you would direct your attention on the worry of the better part of Georgian society with the situation, when the USA pursues the policy of double standards towards Georgia and its leadership. And in connection with notorious "case of press photographers" we would like to find out why adequate sanctions were not applied towards those, who took demonstratively provocative and plainly dangerous decisions not only for Georgia, but also for the whole civilization, although recent examples of such US practice are well known for everyone now. We suppose that President M. Saakashvili, the head of Interior Ministry, V. Merabishvili, the Minister of Justice, Z. Adeishvili, the First Deputy Minister of Interior, A. Meskheli, Interior Ministry chief of staff, S. Khizanishvili, and other officials and employees of local forces of law and order, who were directly involved in fabrication of so-called case of press photographers, should be brought to just punishment. In this context, first of all, we supplicate to consider the possibility of establishing restrictions on their entrance to the USA.
We hope for your sense of occasion and correct assessment of all events, happened in this country.


Marina Andguladze (Gedenidze)
Nelli Kirtsikidze
Nestan Neidze
Nino Gavardashvili
Eka Beselia
Soso Tsintsadze
Nino Danelia

The duplicate copy was posted to US Embassy in Tbilisi on Tuesday, August 2nd, 2011, at 11:15 am
Leave your comment
Your name:
Your comment:

Security code: Code
OTHER NEWS
POLL
How do you evaluate detention of former Tbilisi Mayor Gigi Ugulava?
-He was arrested for real crime in accordance to the procedural norms -He was arrested for real crime but through violation of procedural norms -He was arrested based on unreal charge for political motives -I cannot answer

BLOG

Fragile Peace in Balkans
After a long and complicated preparation period, on July 30, we landed in Sarajevo. Despite scary landing caused by bad weather conditions, I
Detailed...
Hungry Commission Members and Commission Chairpersons Angry with Observers in Batumi
Seal without Carve and Voter with Two Names in Guria
Archive

EDITORIAL

What happened to Dream of Justice Revival?
“Miscarriages of justice“– we use this term to characterize the problems existing in the system of Georgian judiciary during ex-president Mikheil Saakashvili’s governance. 
Detailed...
Triggers of Prisoners’ Mass Protests
Autumn Fly
Archive
THEMES
CATEGORIES

Copyright © 2004 - 2014 HRIDC