21:37, Monday, 05.12.2016
YouTube
Twitter
Facebook
RSS
ქართული English

Web Portal on Human Rights in Georgia

Go
Advanced Search

Legal Committee Discussed Bill on Prohibiting Photo-film-video Shooting and Audio Recording in Courtrooms

22.06.2007
The legal Committee discussed the project on amendments to be made to the Organic Law of Georgia on Courts of General Jurisdiction under which photo-film-video shooting and audio recording shall be prohibited in the court building and courtrooms.

Under the present project Article 12, Paragraph 4 of the Organic Law of Georgia on Courts of General Jurisdiction is to be formulated under the wording: “Photo-film-video shooting and audio recording shall be impermissible during the trial in the court building and courtroom. The court is entitled to spread photo-film-video shooting and audio recording materials, unless it contradicts the law”.

According to the authors of the amendments the present law on photo-film-video shooting and audio recording and also TV and radio broadcasting at the court trial “on the one hand contributes to informing the audience of the trial proceedings, but on the other hand cameras in the courtrooms incite staging the trials and provocations by both sides. Under the circumstances the trial goes beyond the legal norms and instead of presenting the proof and discussions the trial process is overwhelmed with agitated statements hampering the trial process and psychologically affecting the judge. Apart from hindering the trial proceedings the aforementioned contributes to the formation of wrong public opinion. The formation of the public opinion ahead of the court adjudication is another example of direct psychological affect over the court. Besides, absolutely groundless statements and comments are aired through mass media outlets, and the formation of public opinion in this way, mainly contradicting to legal regulations, aims at court discredit”.

The authors of the bill also consider that the prohibition of photo-film-video shooting and audio recording does not restrict the principle of publicity of the trial, while any individual, among them mass media representatives are free to attend the trail, the journalists can make notes and publicize the court proceedings and take interviews.

The adoption of the bill, as of being underlined, contradicts neither the EU directives nor Georgia’s bilateral and multilateral agreements.

The parliament opposition does not support the legislative amendment.

Source: Media.ge

Print Send to Friend Send to Facebook Tweet This
Leave your comment
Your name:
Your comment:

Security code: Code
OTHER NEWS
POLL
How the Parliamentary Elections were conducted?
Without violations With violations They were falsified I do not know I hesitate to answer

BLOG

Disbelief based on partiality Reality is different
In recent days, Campaign This Affects You has become more active for the society. A new slogan has appeared on the famous label
Detailed...
Fragile Peace in Balkans
Hungry Commission Members and Commission Chairpersons Angry with Observers in Batumi
Archive




EDITORIAL

Villages of the Hopeless
I learned about healing water Dzuguri first several days ago. Having searched information, we learned that Dzuguri water is sold near the chain
Detailed...
What happened to Dream of Justice Revival?
Triggers of Prisoners’ Mass Protests
Archive
THEMES
CATEGORIES

Copyright © 2004 - 2016 HRIDC